More Pages: Chicago Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94


A wonderfully inventive book that kept me going.
The greatest romance

I know her, she's cool.
Fascinating (and readable)

The city of Chicago never looked so tempting!
Great writing

A decent study aid
Excellent Qual Exam PrepI first went through the "Review of Undergraduate Physics" by Hamermesh to get myself up to speed, then hit this book. It was great preparation for the real thing. I am now buying both books for my students.


Useful for students of ethnography
A "how-to" manual for turning observation into publicationTrue teachers, Emerson, Shaw and Fretz (UCLA faculty) show just as much of the process as they tell. Step by step, readers are walked through the process of turning initial chicken scratches jotted down on scrap paper to publishable ethnographic documents. Rarely will you find more than a page between excerpts from real fieldnotes.
The authors recognize that every field situation is different and ethnographers rarely, if ever, find themselves in ideal situations for writing. Thus, they explain the tensions that constantly pull at ethnographers and also what things will become much easier as ethnographers gain experience. They discuss how to balance observing with writing, and demonstrate that how you write fieldnotes (what you emphasize, point-of-view used, quality of description, representing community members' voices) is just as important as what you write.
Redundancy might be a weak point, but overall the re-explaining of things in two or three different ways serves only to make the reader experience and assimilate the process of writing fieldnotes. Readers can then naturally employ the procedures rather than constantly referring to the book as a "checklist" when doing fieldwork.
I would definitely recommend this book to anyone seeking to understand the worldview and customs of another culture, or doing social research within their own culture. Even if your goal is not to do anthropology or to publish ethnographic documents, turning your experiences and observations into written text helps you to process things. Writing also helps you gain insights about the community you are working with by increasing your observational skills. You will not regret taking time to read Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes.


Preaching to the ConvertedThe Kirkus Review above is typical of this: "In Lott's mind. . . . Lott ignores common sense programs." The conclusion that more legally carried guns leads to less crime, that common sense programs like gun buy-backs don't reduce gun crimes, are driven by the data, not the desires of the author.
Lott's argument is based on hard data. The raw data he has made available to scholars who have asked. (A new scholarly curtesy made practical by computers and mini-discs.) None have refuted his interpretation of the data. Or declared the data inadequate.
But this issue is political and scientific data will continue to be ignored.
Convential wisdom says guns cause violence and crime, right?As the National Review has said, "Lott has done to gun control what Charles Murray did to welfare payments in Losing Ground." This book is a thorough, well-reasoned rebuttal to liberal gun control dogma and it proves that more guns do equal less crime. It's no coincidence that the highest-crime cities have the most gun control and that states like Vermont with "no permit required" concealed-carry enjoy the lowest crime rates. Lott does an excellent job shattering gun control myths... whether its those about gun buybacks, waiting periods, and background checks reducing crime or high-crime being attributable to a "proliferation of weapons." Lott, an economist at the University of Chicago makes a well-reasoned analysis of gun control trends and its consequences, while offering excellent reasoning, verbal logic and statistics based on facts not wild speculation. This is the book too have close at hand when gearing up for a debate with those against the inalienable right to self-defense.
Well-written, important, powerful book"More Guns, Less Crime is one of the most important books of our time." -- Thomas Sowell, Professor, Stanford University
"John Lott has done the most extensive, thorough, and sophisticated study we have on the effects of loosening gun control laws." -- Gary Kleck, Professor, Florida State University
"Lott has done us all a service by his thorough, thoughtful, scholarly approach to a highly controversial issue." -- Milton Friedman, Nobel Prize winning economist, Stanford University
"A model of the meticulous application of economics and statistics to law and policy." John O. McGinnis, Professor, Cardozo Law School
"His empirical analysis sets a standard that will be difficult to match. . . . This has got to be the most extensive empirical study of crime deterrence that has been doen to date." -- Public Choice
"The standard reference on the subject for years to come." Stan Liebowitz, Professor, University of Texas
"This book will - or should - cause those who almost reflexively support the limitation of guns in the name of reducing crime to rethink their position." -- Steve Shavell, Professor, Harvard University Law School
The book has gotten similar positive comments from those working in law enforcement. This is a great book.


One of the more disappointing books I have read.
NOT THE BEST
A good readE. Lynn Harris has perfectly crafted the intricate waft of society's realities. It very well captures the emotions and the voice of the minority by carefully using the plight of four black characters who tried to make it big in the fast-paced setting of Chicago.
Simple yet deep. Sorrowful yet true. Alarming yet very much enriching. "And This Too Shall Pass" is a very impressive and insightful work that challenges the harsh reality, which has been brewing around us, by testing our morality.
A book that shall sit for a time on my nightstand.


A classic pro-socialism account of the failed American Dream
A Great History Fiction
Great Literature with unique irony and social commentaryWe begin with Jurgis and his family leaving Lithuania to come to the 'free' land of America for more opportunities. What they find is a situation where they pay their life savings for a home which they don't really own, a situation in which jobs are scarce and the available ones are very dangerous, and a plethora of new diseases and ailments which take away members of the family bit by bit.
I enjoy the intense irony of this story because they came for freedom and found they themselves locked in poverty because of the capitalist society. The usurping heads of the meat industry end up controlling much more than their wages and their work hours. ...


Overall A Good BookI wished that there had been more development to the Sandy character and I would have liked to have known more about Dashay's mother. It was hard for me to beleive that a mother could leave her baby like that. I know it happens, but it's hard to beleive. More development as to why that happened would have made me happy.
I cried at the end when Isaac proposed to Bebe. I was very happy that things had worked out for them.
I did believe in the characters. Ms. Joe was able to make me feel like these characters were people that I knew. Ms. Joe had the ability to make the characters real. I feel that that is the most important thing an author can do. As I said, I felt that overall the book was a good read. I look forward to reading future projects by Ms. Joe.
Wonderfully written!
This book was a terrific sequel to He Say, She Say!